tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Dec 07 09:33:42 2007

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Prefix and noun agreement

Michael Roney (

jatlh SuStel:

>Between your response and those of Qov and naHQun, my impression is that 
>everyone is trying to figure out what I meant, and overlooking whether 
>they think it's *right*.

While I don't think that it's "wrong", I'm also not going to call it "right". It works-kinda,
but not in an easily understandable way. If I see it again, I'll grimmace, but I won't correct
anyone and tell them to change it either.

So I think what I'm trying to say is, it's not incorrect, it's just not the best way to do it-find a work around.

(Which I think has already been pointed out...)


Michael Roney

boSlu'meH QaQ jajvam!
Today is a good day to collect!

Back to archive top level