tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 02 19:31:44 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for 2006/10/26
- From: pm5 <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Dilbert Comic in Klingon for 2006/10/26
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:31:23 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=itxg7A/OFU+DbO7EwWifEq1FBf/LYOWr5B6aIaUaAFb/QyHnjT3NsalQQNjykea0x2irxfCcYvcPRdxgBcCpLdfUPyVL5SZDZujIuYJm4eEkzJo6wmON0H2lNEwT6FV3gbuoruUOP7mqRd9W1odi+2Ut2NZjiVD7QkgGTYt9vkc=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On 11/3/06, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> pm5 wrote:
> >ratbot: Hoch to'meywIj DaHachmeH wanI' DapabHa' 'e' vISaH.
> >Ratbert: "I worried that all of my wisdom is derived from
> > bad analogies."
>
> I'm not sure I understand your Klingon here - "you misfollow an event in
> order for you are developed all my tactics"?
I used the wrong prefix. I was meant to say {Hoch to'meywIj vIHachmeH wanI'
vIpabHa'} "I misfollowed experiences in order to develop all my tactics", which
is still wrong because {Hach} doesn't take objects.
> here. {chen} "build up, take form, take shape" might be better.
Agreed.
> I do like {pabHa'} "misfollow (the rules), follow (the rules) wrongly" but
> I'm not sure how we can work it to render "derived from bad analogies".
> Maybe the two can be combined:
>
> pabHa' chenpu'bogh Hoch SovwIj 'e' vISaH.
Can knowledge take form and misfollow the rules itself, or must someone form
knowledge and while doing so, misfollowed the rules?
{Hoch SovwIj vIchenpu'DI vIpabHa' 'e' vISaH.}
pm5