tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue May 02 09:30:43 2006

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: Stovokor

DloraH ([email protected])

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: Stovokor
• Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:30:30 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• Thread-index: AcZuAiljCJNbqhFJTBebOzxcvbz8QQAAsDYQ

> Boy, I'm not paying attention to my own posts.  The TKW 
> example proves you 
> *can* be dishonored by someone else.  Not to mention that 
> Worf accepted 
> discommendation and was officially dishonored by the alleged 
> acts of his 
> father Mogh (ENT "Sins of the Father").  So grammar aside, 
> Shane's post is 
> entirely possible - if somewhat obscure.
> 
> HIvqa' veqlargh.  (appropriately enough!)

But the reason for dishonoring them would be because of their
action/inaction.  (In Worf's case it was his father's supposed action.)

Even though Worf was offically dishonored by the council, I think he would
not have gone to ghe'tor because really he nor his father actually did
anything wrong.  You don't go to ghe'tor because of what other mortals think
of you.


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • quvHa'; ghe'tor ngan rur [was Re: Stovokor]
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
  • RE: Stovokor
    • From: Shane MiQogh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Stovokor
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Stovokor
• Next by Date: quvHa'; ghe'tor ngan rur [was Re: Stovokor]
• Previous by thread: Re: Stovokor
• Next by thread: quvHa'; ghe'tor ngan rur [was Re: Stovokor]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level