tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 24 03:18:58 2006
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: loy
- From: Philip Newton <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: loy
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:18:17 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JtpO9rQ611r0bqwEZUj9ilw+XugMFhh/OU1egHOwLlMXs1SMElKTWKd6m9lHQBvaz7iCJtyXjnyuc4h+h0R6WHFsgarJUWpBo0VPYbP4KI2PoVHoS0J6qj7eV+2rPRB+xgNkra/7WeZSBUfhvjxgCc7owwX29GdvBjqdyiWg+NQ=
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On 1/23/06, Steven Boozer <[email protected]> wrote:
> chorghSaD qelI'qam HIvchuq'e' vInoH
> Estimating attack range in 8,000 kellicams. (ST5)
Does that mean that {HIvchuq} is canon for "attack range"? I don't
have that in my wordlist (only {HIv} (v.) and {chuq} (n.) as separate
words).
--
Philip Newton <[email protected]>
HovpoH 5212.35