tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed May 11 15:47:40 2005
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Subtle shadings of "then": Okrand's error ?
- From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: Subtle shadings of "then": Okrand's error ?
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:47:26 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Thread-index: AcVWUwjPQXj5hq9WQDSmaz1fXN78QgAJwhpg
> vaj ...
> -chugh ...
I personally don't use /vaj/ and /-chugh/ together because to me a /vaj/ after /-chugh/ seems to be redundant. To me, /-chugh/ has
it almost built into its meaning.
bIjeghbe'chugh bIHegh. If you do not surrender you will die.
bIjeghbe', vaj bIHegh. You did not surrender, thus you will die.
bIjeghbe'chugh, vaj bIHegh. If you do not surrender, then/thus/so you will die.
Sure, it's allowed, but it sounds weird to me.
DloraH