tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 07 05:08:52 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)

ngabwI' ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Anderson" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)


> ja' QeS lagh:
>>Nevertheless, there *is* the canon example {telDaq wovmoHwI'mey} on the 
>>BoP
>>poster, which does appear to be an abnormal noun-noun construction.
>
> If you don't like dismissing it as an error, this example can also be
> interpreted as a normal noun-noun construction, with the {telDaq} being a
> compound "wing-location" instead of a noun with a type 5 suffix.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'

FWIW, I concur. This could easily be taken as "technical" Klingon for the 
tips of the wings, IMHO

--ngabwI'
jatlh Huch, 'ach bom yuch!
"Money talks, but chocolate sings!"
HovpoH 702883.5 





Back to archive top level