tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 07 04:37:40 2005

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)

Eric Andeen ([email protected])

• From: "Eric Andeen" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)
• Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:49:11 -0700
• Thread-index: AcU7BGy658HBXI+tRkqMpu7TkledmQADrwLQ
• Thread-topic: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)

ghItlhlu':

>>>
Nevertheless, there *is* the canon example {telDaq wovmoHwI'mey} on the
BoP poster, which does appear to be an abnormal noun-noun construction.
This, though, is nothing more than an error IMHO; the same meaning could
have been conveyed with the garden-variety noun-noun construction {tel
wovmoHwI'mey} "wing lights".
<<<

This just a label on a technical diagram, not even a full sentence. It
need not be a noun-noun construction. <telDaq> could be describing the
location (just in case the little arrow was insufficient) and
<wovmoHwI'mey> could be the descriptive label. This could be short for
<telDaq wovmoHwI'mey lutu'lu'>, with the obvious verb omitted. ghIlab
ghewmey tIbuSQo'.

pagh

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: Qa'Hom (noun)
• Next by Date: Re: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)
• Previous by thread: Re: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)
• Next by thread: RE: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level