tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Apr 06 19:49:22 2005
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ghe''orDaq luSpet (Re: pIpyuS Sarghmey je)
ja' QeS lagh:
>Nevertheless, there *is* the canon example {telDaq wovmoHwI'mey} on the BoP
>poster, which does appear to be an abnormal noun-noun construction.
If you don't like dismissing it as an error, this example can also be
interpreted as a normal noun-noun construction, with the {telDaq} being a
compound "wing-location" instead of a noun with a type 5 suffix.
-- ghunchu'wI'