tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 09 02:40:57 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
- From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 11:40:18 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Organization: qepHom.de
- References: <[email protected]>
- User-agent: Opera7.11/Win32 M2 build 2887
ghItlh QeS lagh <[email protected]>:
> What do you think? As well, it leads one to wonder whether there's a
> corresponding verb for "be at a positive angle".
That's easy: taHHa' }};-)
Quvar.
![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}
![[Hol ghojwI']](/pics/level2_big.png "[Hol ghojwI']"){kind=small}