tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 08 19:48:11 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)

cheesbro ([email protected])

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 22:47:54 -0400 (EDT)
• User-agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> ghItlh QeS lagh:
> 
> > Duj taHDaq yIbach
> > Shoot at the at-a-negative-angle ship!
>
> ghItlh jIqel:
> 
> > I think <Duj taH yIbach> is sufficient.  The locative suffix -Daq=20
> > is not necessary in this sentence.
> 
> ghaytan mojaq <-Daq> chelnISlu'. mu'tlhegh <pe'vIl mu'qaDmey tIbach>
> yIqel: peng bachlaHbej vay'. 'ach DoS bachlaH'a' vay'?=20
> 
> mu'tlhegh <vaj toDuj ngeHbej DI vI'> yIqaw je. bachHa'mo' Hov leng
> lIngwI'pu', mu'tlheghvam lo'lu', 'ach mu'tlhegh wa'DIch qonDI' Marc
> Okrand, pImqu'. vIqawchu'be', 'ach mu'tlheghvam - <logh veQDaq
> bachlu'DI', {yoH?} 'e' toblaHbe' SuvwI'> - rur. vaj DoS bachlaHbe'law'
> vay'. DoSDaq bachlu'.
> 
> pagh

KGT p56:
The verb used for "shoot" when referring to disrupters is bach.  Technically 
speaking, one shoots the energy beam from the disrupter. (...) Thus, the 
correct formation is nISwI' tIH bach ("shoot the disrupter beam").  As a 
practical matter, however, the tIH is often left out, and nISwI' bach is the 
common way to say "shoot a disrupter."


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
    • From: "Heather Myers" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Next by Date: Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Previous by thread: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Next by thread: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level