tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 08 19:08:53 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)

Eric Andeen ([email protected])

• From: "Eric Andeen" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:58:05 -0700
• Thread-index: AcRNunjZTsHfNcWsRIiV+d/TEtCPywAAWnbg
• Thread-topic: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)

ghItlh QeS lagh:

> Duj taHDaq yIbach
> Shoot at the at-a-negative-angle ship!

ghItlh jIqel:

> I think <Duj taH yIbach> is sufficient.  The locative suffix -Daq=20
> is not necessary in this sentence.

ghaytan mojaq <-Daq> chelnISlu'. mu'tlhegh <pe'vIl mu'qaDmey tIbach>
yIqel: peng bachlaHbej vay'. 'ach DoS bachlaH'a' vay'?=20

mu'tlhegh <vaj toDuj ngeHbej DI vI'> yIqaw je. bachHa'mo' Hov leng
lIngwI'pu', mu'tlheghvam lo'lu', 'ach mu'tlhegh wa'DIch qonDI' Marc
Okrand, pImqu'. vIqawchu'be', 'ach mu'tlheghvam - <logh veQDaq
bachlu'DI', {yoH?} 'e' toblaHbe' SuvwI'> - rur. vaj DoS bachlaHbe'law'
vay'. DoSDaq bachlu'.

pagh

• Prev by Date: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Next by Date: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Previous by thread: Re: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Next by thread: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level