tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 09 07:09:09 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)

Heather Myers ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol ghojwI']

> Subject: RE: taH (was Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey)
> 
> > ghItlh QeS lagh:
> >
> > > Duj taHDaq yIbach
> > > Shoot at the at-a-negative-angle ship!
> >
> > ghItlh jI'qel:
> >
> > > I think <Duj taH yIbach> is sufficient.  The locative suffix
-Daq=20
> > > is not necessary in this sentence.
> >
> > ghaytan mojaq <-Daq> chelnISlu'. mu'tlhegh <pe'vIl mu'qaDmey tIbach>
> > yIqel: peng bachlaHbej vay'. 'ach DoS bachlaH'a' vay'?=20
> >
> > mu'tlhegh <vaj toDuj ngeHbej DI vI'> yIqaw je. bachHa'mo' Hov leng
> > lIngwI'pu', mu'tlheghvam lo'lu', 'ach mu'tlhegh wa'DIch qonDI' Marc
> > Okrand, pImqu'. vIqawchu'be', 'ach mu'tlheghvam - <logh veQDaq
> > bachlu'DI', {yoH?} 'e' toblaHbe' SuvwI'> - rur. vaj DoS
bachlaHbe'law'
> > vay'. DoSDaq bachlu'.
> >
> > pagh
> 
> KGT p56:
> The verb used for "shoot" when referring to disrupters is bach.
> Technically
> speaking, one shoots the energy beam from the disrupter. (...) Thus,
the
> correct formation is nISwI' tIH bach ("shoot the disrupter beam").  As
a
> practical matter, however, the tIH is often left out, and nISwI' bach
is
> the
> common way to say "shoot a disrupter."
> 
> 
> DloraH

Sulugh.  QeS lagh mu'tlhegh vIlaDDI', jIQub: <"at" chel 'e' nID yabDaj
DIvI' Hol>.  ghu'vam Del KGT 'e' vIlIjpu'.  tulughmoHmo' Satlho'.

DopDaq qul yIchenmoH QobDI' ghu'.

jIqel ghojwI'
<batlh wo' yejHaD je vItoy'mo' jIHem>

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.686 / Virus Database: 447 - Release Date: 14-May-2004

Back to archive top level