tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 04 06:05:59 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey

Alan Anderson ([email protected])

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 23:38:05 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' lay'tel SIvten:
>...Why
>shouldn't the hard work of thinking how to say something be handed down to the
>beginners instead of forcing each new person to come up with his own way of
>saying something?

nap ghu'.  ghojmeH vay', vumnIS.  Sovqoq Hevchugh neH chu'wI', pagh ghoj.

bIvumbe'law'taH SoH.  bIqeqbe'taH.  DIvI' Hol neH Dalo'taH 'e'
Damevbe'chugh, tlhIngan Hol DaghojtaH'a'?

>How do you deal with words that have never been used in canon?  Do you use
>them yourself, or do you wait for clarification from Okrand?

roD jIloS, 'ach rut qech vIDelmeH mu' vISovchu'be'bogh vIjunlaHbe'.  vaj
vIlo', 'ej vIyajlu' 'e' vIpIH, 'ach chaq muj lo'wIj 'e' vIlajqangbej.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Next by Date: Q: "Unique subject string"?
• Previous by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Next by thread: Re: mu' lo' QaQ 'oSbogh mu'tlheghmey
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level