tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 23 15:46:03 2004
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: If You're Happy; Was: {qon} vs {gher}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:19 PM
Subject: If You're Happy; Was: {qon} vs {gher}
[Horrible misspelling of her name deleted by security] }}: )
> Yeees, you did mangle the name a bit. As was revealed recently the name is
> actually Kranbo. ;)
>
> pong DaghItlhHa'bej. qen ngoDvam 'anglu': Kranbo 'oH pong'e'. {{;-)
jItlhIj.
> >did a Klingon version of "If You're Happy and You Know It" ({bIQuchchugh
> >'ej DaSovchugh})
>
> tlhIngan Hol bom mu'mey:
qatlho'qu'. tagha' vISuqqa'laH!
> qaStaHvIS qep'a' *cabaret* wot <<Sen>> lo'bogh mu'tlhegh'e' Hutlh bomvam.
> rInDI' qep'a' mu'tlheghvam vIchel. Qap DIp <<qogh>> 'e' vItul.
Anything to get the {SenwI'} Local 432 off your back, right?
{Duvlaw' *SenwI'mey vummeH ghom*}
> >So I'm not going to tell Krankor and Angieska that their usage of {ghov}
is
> >incorrect, because I cannot say that it is. But until we're told
otherwise,
> >*I* *personally* will not use it this way.
> Qap mu'tlheghvam 'e' ghovbe'chugh vay' 'ej tlhIngan belHa' ghaHchugh vaj
> qoghDaj rIlnISbej! {{;-)
::loQ Hagh:: bIlughlaw' }}: )
--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org
HovpoH 701952.8