tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 23 15:46:03 2004

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: If You're Happy; Was: {qon} vs {gher}

ngabwI' ([email protected]) [KLI Member] [Hol po'wI']



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Agnieszka Solska" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:19 PM
Subject: If You're Happy; Was: {qon} vs {gher}


[Horrible misspelling of her name deleted by security] }}: )

> Yeees, you did mangle the name a bit. As was revealed recently the name is
> actually Kranbo. ;)
>
> pong DaghItlhHa'bej. qen ngoDvam 'anglu': Kranbo 'oH pong'e'. {{;-)

jItlhIj.

> >did a Klingon version of "If You're Happy and You Know It" ({bIQuchchugh
> >'ej DaSovchugh})
>
> tlhIngan Hol bom mu'mey:

qatlho'qu'. tagha' vISuqqa'laH!

> qaStaHvIS qep'a' *cabaret* wot <<Sen>> lo'bogh mu'tlhegh'e' Hutlh bomvam.
> rInDI' qep'a' mu'tlheghvam vIchel.  Qap DIp <<qogh>> 'e' vItul.

Anything to get the {SenwI'} Local 432 off your back, right?

{Duvlaw' *SenwI'mey vummeH ghom*}

> >So I'm not going to tell Krankor and Angieska that their usage of {ghov}
is
> >incorrect, because I cannot say that it is. But until we're told
otherwise,
> >*I* *personally* will not use it this way.
> Qap mu'tlheghvam 'e' ghovbe'chugh vay' 'ej tlhIngan belHa' ghaHchugh vaj
> qoghDaj rIlnISbej! {{;-)

::loQ Hagh:: bIlughlaw' }}: )

--ngabwI'
Beginners' Grammarian
Klingon Language Institute
http://kli.org
HovpoH 701952.8





Back to archive top level