tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 16 17:58:30 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Enterprise

David Trimboli ([email protected])

From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Enterprise
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:01:35 -0500
References: <NMVPYTJIHCURB98KF8DBZWKIGBPNVS.3fb37590@quvar> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

> /tlhIngan-Hol/2003/January/msg00036.html
>
> With relevant excerpt:
> WM:   And a typical direct object of ja' would be the person addressed and
>       a typical object of the verb jatlh would be the thing you say.
>
> MO:   The speech event.
>
> But, I still misused {ja'}

Please note that Will's mention of a "direct object of /ja'/" is not
commented on by Okrand.  There is no canon to confirm this with any
certainty.  It is simply his opinion.  (I don't even subscribe to the notion
that Klingons differentiate between "direct" and "indirect" objects in their
language, but Will is convinced they do.)

Use /ja'/ however YOU prefer to use it.

David
Stardate 3876.7

References:
- Re: Enterprise
  - From: Lieven L. Litaer (Quvar) <[email protected]>
- Re: Enterprise
  - From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>
- Re: Enterprise
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Re: Enterprise
  - From: "Scott Willis" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Hoghvam 'entepray' lutHom: "North Star" {'ev chan Hov}
Next by Date: Qo'noS
Prev by thread: Re: Enterprise
Next by thread: Re: Enterprise
Index(es):