tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 01 18:16:30 2003
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Barkley rur ghaH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hakuohalakahiki Dei nucis naHQun El dios de piņa"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: Barkley rur ghaH
> Do you know if that Xindi was played by the same actor as Lt. Barkley?
Qo'. Xindi ghaH 'e' ghet *John Cothran Jr.*
Barkley ghaH 'e' ghet *Dwight Schultz*.
(I have no idea if we can use {ghet} like this, but what the heck. How's it
look, ya'll?)
> Please don't correct my grammer without answering my question.
OK, I've answered.
> Yes, I know that {-Daq} does not work in the sense I'm using it.
maj.
> 'entepray'DajDaq Hoghvam.
Well, I don't see why you would have to use {-Daj}. It seems that you could
completely sidestep that whole situation with a simple noun-noun construct
(TKD):
{Hoghvam 'entepray' lutHom}
"This week's Enterprise episode"
(OK, OK, that's a noun-noun-noun construct.) }}: )
> Also, a week can probably not posess anything.
Why not?
> [Barkley] [Xindi] ghetwI''a'?
I'd like to buy a verb. }}: P
> Do you know if that Xindi was played by the same actor as Lt. Barkley?
{wa' ghot chaH Xindi ghetwI''e', Barkley ghetwI''e' je 'e' boSov'a'?}
"Do ya'll know if the Xindi actor and the Barkley actor are one person?"
is my suggestion, but I'm not totally confident that {wa' ghot} conveys the
meaning of "one and the same".
> ~naHQun;
> tlhInganpu' tIQ Qun
--ngabwI'
tIq. taQ. tlhIngan tlhaq. HovpoH!
http://web.tampabay.rr.com/ngabwi/
HovpoH 700737.8