tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu May 22 23:38:31 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Opposite of -wI'

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Opposite of -wI'
• Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 00:34:26 EDT

It does seem possible that the Klingon verb stem can have suffixes preceeding 
-wI'.  Some do not appear quite logical.  About 6 years ago, Mark Shoulson 
said that using both -lu' and -wI' would not work.

I can see that -chuq is a problem.  -neS just doesn't do much.

But, -choH, -qa', -nIS, -vIp, -qang, -rup, -beH, -laH, -taH, -lI', pu', -ta' 
all appear to have limited possibilities.  I'd like to see comments and 
thoughts about this for a while.  I don't see any reason to claim that they can work 
at all times.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Opposite of -wI'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: tlhingan Hol vIghojmeH Sajatlh
• Next by Date: DIp Dabogh <<-bogh>> mu'
• Prev by thread: Re: PARAMOUNT HOL
• Next by thread: Re: Opposite of -wI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level