tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Jun 13 11:27:25 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: untranstvty

• From: Quvar valer (Lieven) <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: untranstvty
• Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:40:44 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

>jatlh Quvar:
>> Can one say that *all* verbs which are translated "be xyz" are intransitive?
>> I noticed that most are, and I think all are. But I might oversee something.

ja' mulwI':
>I'm familiar with about 0,01 percent of Klingon vocabulary, but I don't
>think any verb that has a transitive *meaning* could be translated as
>"be xyz". 

I'm asking the other way around: is a klingon verb "be xyz" always an intransitive verb?

Quvar.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: untranstvty
    • From: "J.R." <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: untranstvty
    • From: "J.R." <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC chepqu' ne' QonoS
• Next by Date: forgot subject line
• Prev by thread: Re: untranstvty
• Next by thread: Re: untranstvty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level