tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 23 00:39:05 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: RE: "to be" and plurals

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: RE: "to be" and plurals
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 06:26:35 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ghItlh pagh:

> When counting inherently plural nouns, I always revert to the singular form:

That sounds a bit like a contradiction!

Quvar.

• References:
  • RE: "to be" and plurals
    • From: Eric Andeen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC prayer
• Next by Date: Re: "to be" and plurals
• Prev by thread: RE: "to be" and plurals
• Next by thread: Re: "to be" and plurals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level