tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 23 00:39:19 2003

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "to be" and plurals

• From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: "to be" and plurals
• Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 06:23:41 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ghItlh Voragh:

>   yaS ghaH no'chaj'e'.
>   His ancestors were officers.

I've seen this in SuStel's mail, but I didn't point at it. Now that I see it again, so I just *must* mention:

   "his" {-Daj}
   "their" {-chaj}

Quvar.

• References:
  • Re: "to be" and plurals
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: "to be" and plurals
• Next by Date: Safely F e e l Young! 0562qjFx2-101aNVb0170idxh9-7-26
• Prev by thread: Re: "to be" and plurals
• Next by thread: Re: "to be" and plurals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level