Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)

[Stephan Schneider <sts@stephan-schneider.net>]

>From: "Quvar valer" <levinius@gmx.de>
>>  tulwI':
>>
>>  >is /neH/ the only verb that doesn't need /'e'/?
>>
>>  No.read TKD, section 6.2.5. Sentences as objects:
>
><DoS ghajbogh mu'tlheghna'> bIHbe' jatlhmeH mu' mu'tlheghmey.  jatlhmeH mu'
>tlha'laH DoSqoq pagh jatlhmeH mu' nunglaH DoSqoq.  not <'e'> <net> joq
>lulo'lu' <neH> 'oHchugh wot'a''e'.

i don't understand this klingon.

"the target that an evident sentence has" they aren't in order that 
word sentences say. in order that a word speaks a so called target 
can follow it or in order that a word can speak a so called target 
can precede. never /-'e'/ and/or /net/ can be used if it's a major 
verb to be /neH/.

what did i made wrong?

tulwI',
sts.