tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 03 08:32:21 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

<'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)

From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
Subject: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:28:30 -0400
References: <VRMZVURIEB985EICQKUSZWQNIGUQNI.3d739d0b@pc>

From: "Quvar valer" <[email protected]>
> tulwI':
>
> >is /neH/ the only verb that doesn't need /'e'/?
>
> No.read TKD, section 6.2.5. Sentences as objects:


<DoS ghajbogh mu'tlheghna'> bIHbe' jatlhmeH mu' mu'tlheghmey.  jatlhmeH mu'
tlha'laH DoSqoq pagh jatlhmeH mu' nunglaH DoSqoq.  not <'e'> <net> joq
lulo'lu' <neH> 'oHchugh wot'a''e'.

SuStel
Stardate 2673.7

Follow-Ups:
- Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
  - From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
- Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
  - From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
  - From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: shorter case name.
Next by Date: Re: Names for noun functions (Was: Re: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
Prev by thread: Re: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'? (was: RE: EK: tayqeq wej)
Next by thread: Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
Index(es):

Back to archive top level