tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 03 09:48:30 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)

From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 16:50:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' SuStel:

>From: "Quvar valer" <[email protected]>
>> tulwI':
>> >is /neH/ the only verb that doesn't need /'e'/?
>>
>> No.read TKD, section 6.2.5. Sentences as objects:
>
>
><DoS ghajbogh mu'tlheghna'> bIHbe' jatlhmeH mu' mu'tlheghmey.  
bIlugh. 'a TKD 'ay'vamDaq bIH luDellu'.
cha' mu'tlheghmey bIH: {jIjatlh: bIlugh.}

>jatlhmeH mu'
>tlha'laH DoSqoq pagh jatlhmeH mu' nunglaH DoSqoq.
qar. TKDDaq leghlaH vay'.

>not <'e'> <net> joq lulo'lu' <neH> 'oHchugh wot'a''e'.


Quvar.

References:
- <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
  - From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: jatlhwI' tlhab (was Re: Names for noun functions)
Next by Date: Re: tlhe' - trans or intrans
Prev by thread: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
Next by thread: Re: <'e'> lo'be' <neH> (was: nuq 'oH KLBC'e'?)
Index(es):