tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Sep 04 08:07:28 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
- From: "Sangqar (Sean Healy)" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'
- Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 13:05:01 +0000
>>>Actually, the term 'genitive' has been used on this list to describe the
>>>function of the first noun in a noun-noun construction. To slip into the
>>>fiction of Klingon for a bit, I suspect that long ago, there was a
>>>'genitive' syntactic marker, and like the other syntactic markers it was
>>>a Type 5 suffix. This would explain why nouns occupying that grammatical
>>>role can't take Type 5 suffixes - it's a holdover from when those nouns
>>>had Type 5 suffixes of their own.
>>
>>jI'omlaHbe': chaq <-'I'> 'oH mojaqvam'e'.
>
>Sangqar,
>qatlh <-'I'>?
qIDwIj QIj lutvam: http://www.klingonska.org/canon/1996-09.txt
>tulwI',
>sts.
Sangqar
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx