tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 08 06:01:19 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: tlhIngan Hol lujatlhbogh puq'e'



>>>>Actually, the term 'genitive' has been used on this list to 
>>>>describe the function of the first noun in a noun-noun 
>>>>construction.  To slip into the fiction of Klingon for a bit, I 
>>>>suspect that long ago, there was a 'genitive' syntactic marker, 
>>>>and like the other syntactic markers it was a Type 5 suffix. 
>>>>This would explain why nouns occupying that grammatical role 
>>>>can't take Type 5 suffixes - it's a holdover from when those 
>>>>nouns had Type 5 suffixes of their own.
>>>
>>>jI'omlaHbe': chaq <-'I'> 'oH mojaqvam'e'.
>>
>>Sangqar,
>>qatlh <-'I'>?
>
>qIDwIj QIj lutvam: http://www.klingonska.org/canon/1996-09.txt
>
>>tulwI',
>>sts.
>
>Sangqar

Sangqar,
i read it and i don't understand what's the link to a type 5 noun suffix.
tulwI',
sts.


Back to archive top level