tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 14 02:55:37 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re[2]: KLBC the effects of -Ha'

• From: DWW <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re[2]: KLBC the effects of -Ha'
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:51:34 +0300
• In-reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <31998Q51FD353YHB83PM62L2YGD.3dd254d3@quvar><[email protected]>

sec> Hopefully my comments aren't sounding like I'm jumping in the "opposite"
sec> boat over the "wrongly" boat...  I don't have any particular opinion on
sec> these.  I might think that there may be semantic(?) reasons that some verbs
sec> wouldn't take <-Ha'> anyway, so maybe <leghHa'> wouldn't be a Klingon word
sec> anyway...

[To make blind] qeghlaH [leghHa'] mu''a'?

sec> Russ Perry Jr
sec> No .sig today.

--- DImatlh

HovpoH 2870.2

• References:
  • Re: KLBC the effects of -Ha'
    • From: Quvar valer <[email protected]>
  • Re: KLBC the effects of -Ha'
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Star Trek III: The Search for Spock - Special Collector's Edition
• Next by Date: Re: Star Trek III: The Search for Spock - Special Collector's Edition
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC the effects of -Ha'
• Next by thread: KLBC the effects of -Ha' thanks and explaning my name.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level