tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 25 05:14:17 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH

At 23:52 24-3-02 -0500, you wrote:
> > qavan DloraH,
>Perhaps a , should be put in there because DloraH is not the subject.
>qavan, DloraH.

But, doesn't the verb prefix qa- already indicate DloraH isn't the subject?

> > qaStaHvIS 'op poH tlhIngan Hol vIghoj,
>'op poH?  jarmey?  wa' DIS?  vagh DIS?

'op jarmey. loS jar.

> > 'ej vaj pIj jIqeqnIS 'e' vIwuqta'.
>TKD p66: ...the second verb never takes an aspect suffix.
>So we can't have  /'e' vIwuqta'/

Ok, right... so... /'ej vaj pIj jIqeqnISta' 'e' vIwuq/ then?

>DloraH, BG

Dum'er, B

Back to archive top level