tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Mar 24 23:52:53 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
• Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 23:52:49 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> qavan DloraH,

Perhaps a , should be put in there because DloraH is not the subject.
qavan, DloraH.

 
> qaStaHvIS 'op poH tlhIngan Hol vIghoj,

'op poH?  jarmey?  wa' DIS?  vagh DIS?  


> 'ej vaj pIj jIqeqnIS 'e' vIwuqta'. 

TKD p66: ...the second verb never takes an aspect suffix.
So we can't have  /'e' vIwuqta'/


> tlhIngan Hol vIghojchu' vIneH, choyaj'a'?

HIja'


> QaghmeywIj Dangu'laH'a' 'ej 
> choHmey DachuplaH'a'? 'ej yIyuDHa'chu'! jIghojmeH HIboQneS!

majQa'


DloraH, BG

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
    • From: DOOM_er <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
    • From: DOOM_er <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: {-be'}
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: {-be'}
• Prev by thread: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
• Next by thread: RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level