tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Mar 25 18:06:57 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
• Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 18:06:53 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> > > qavan DloraH,
> >
> >Perhaps a , should be put in there because DloraH is not the subject.
> >qavan, DloraH.
>
> But, doesn't the verb prefix qa- already indicate DloraH isn't
> the subject?

A beginner might think OVS, see /DloraH/ in the subject place and come up
with "I, DloraH, salute you."


> > > 'ej vaj pIj jIqeqnIS 'e' vIwuqta'.
> >
> >TKD p66: ...the second verb never takes an aspect suffix.
> >So we can't have  /'e' vIwuqta'/
>
> Ok, right... so... /'ej vaj pIj jIqeqnISta' 'e' vIwuq/ then?

Yes.


DloraH, BG

• References:
  • RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
    • From: DOOM_er <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: nested <<'e'>>s
• Next by Date: Re: KLBC: {-be'}
• Prev by thread: RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
• Next by thread: RE: [KLBC] loQ jIqeqnIS neH
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level