tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 20 16:08:44 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: the banned book

• From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: the banned book
• Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:49:14 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]>

Voragh,
thank you for the explanation, and sorry, that i didn't thank 
beforehand in order to avoid writing another e-mail that fills the 
list. sorry-thanks.
stephan,
sts.

>Because {-chaj} "their" has no variant for nouns "capable of using 
>language".  This variation occurs *only* in the first and second 
>persons - e.g. {-maj}/{-ma'} "our", {-lIj}/{-lI'} "your", etc. - not 
>in the third.  Okrand added a few irregularities to tlhIngan Hol to 
>make it feel more "natural".  It's one of those exceptions that 
>you've just got to learn.  (It fooled me too when I was first 
>learning Klingon!)

• References:
  • Re: the banned book
    • From: Pillow <[email protected]>
  • Re: the banned book
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: the banned book
    • From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC - a question which has puzzled me
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC - a question which has puzzled me
• Prev by thread: Re: the banned book
• Next by thread: Re: the banned book / BG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level