tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 17 11:09:20 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: the banned book / BG

• From: Pillow <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: the banned book / BG
• Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:16:32 -0700
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <a05111703b931fddd4a27@[151.25.138.219]>

HetaQ is the author of the book. I used <SuvwI'meychaj> to try to imply
"Warriors' scattered-all-about posssession"
perhaps that wasn't the correct usage. Should I have used the <-vaD>
suffix to mean "intended for warriors all-around"?
pIl'o'

Stephan Schneider wrote:

> >HetaQ paq ngevqa'law' SuvwI'meychaj  malja'.
>
> qayaj vInIDmeH, tlhIngan Hol vIghoj.
>
> i'm trying to understand your dialogues in order to learn klingon.
> what is "HetaQ"? and why do you say "SuvwI'meychaj" instead of
> "SuvwI'pu'chaj" (and why there is no "cha'" in klingon)?
>
> stephan,
> sts.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: the banned book / BG
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • Re: the banned book
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: the banned book
    • From: Pillow <[email protected]>
  • Re: the banned book
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Headers. Yet again.
• Next by Date: Re: the banned book / BG
• Prev by thread: Re: the banned book
• Next by thread: Re: the banned book / BG
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level