tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jul 13 11:22:19 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: romanization
Andrew Strader lab:
>mughtaHvIS qon Stephan Schneider:
>
>> > Ghaytan niv degh dupvam,
>> likely this strategy superior symbols,
>
>"Degh Dupvam" is N-N. So, "This strategy of symbols is likely superior."
unfortunately i didn't know to use the adjectives. now, maybe, i know
it a little better.
> > > Bong latlh pat kawlu'di', pij degh lughbe' lo'la'.
>> by accident as one remembers an additional system, often one can use
>> *not to be right* symbol.
>
>latlh = other
>lughbe' = wrong
>So, "When one accidentally remembers the other system, one can write the
>wrong symbol."
what kind of construction is "latlh pat"? is it N-N? it seems like
yes. so it would be "the system of an additional". right?
> > always when i go on using the klingon language i use '7'.
>
>I see you are enjoying my Klingon. :) I always aim for "good" Klingon, but
>I'm finding that people's opinions of what good Klingon is vary wildly. I
>endeavor to use words closest to the way I think Okrand uses them, but there
>will always be this continual problem of individual interpretations. Ah well,
>it'll all sort itself out in time. We're all a learning bunch.
>
>> (i prefer the usual system in order to respect *lurDegh*.
>
>Uhh, that's lurDech, tradition.
>
>Tradition!!!!! ;)
i see! aha! toH!
bye,
stephan,
sts.