tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jul 09 10:45:39 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: romanization
- From: Andrew Strader <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: romanization
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:44:37 +0000
- Organization: Decode
mughtaHvIS qon Stephan Schneider:
> > Ghaytan niv degh dupvam,
> likely this strategy superior symbols,
"Degh Dupvam" is N-N. So, "This strategy of symbols is likely superior."
> > Bong latlh pat kawlu'di', pij degh lughbe' lo'la'.
> by accident as one remembers an additional system, often one can use
> *not to be right* symbol.
latlh = other
lughbe' = wrong
So, "When one accidentally remembers the other system, one can write the
wrong symbol."
> always when i go on using the klingon language i use '7'.
I see you are enjoying my Klingon. :) I always aim for "good" Klingon, but
I'm finding that people's opinions of what good Klingon is vary wildly. I
endeavor to use words closest to the way I think Okrand uses them, but there
will always be this continual problem of individual interpretations. Ah well,
it'll all sort itself out in time. We're all a learning bunch.
> (i prefer the usual system in order to respect *lurDegh*.
Uhh, that's lurDech, tradition.
Tradition!!!!! ;)
--
Andrew Strader