tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jan 29 19:08:23 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: pIqaD

• From: "TPO" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: pIqaD
• Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 19:08:13 -0500
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> qech mughermoH QInmeyvam
> KLBC: Have I used [-moH] correctly in the sentence above???

Using -moH on a transitive verb is very tricky.  There has been bloodshed
over this.  We could probably get away with this one because of what is
called "the prefix trick".  With the PT, even tho there is a noun for the
object, the prefix points to a first or second person object.

If you want to put a -moH on a transitive verb, recast using multiple
sentences.


DloraH, BG

• Follow-Ups:
  • KLBC -moH [was Re: pIqaD]
    • From: "qe'San \(temp ADSL email\)" <[email protected]>
  • {-moH} and transitive verbs (was RE: pIqaD)
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: pIqaD
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC
• Prev by thread: RE: pIqaD
• Next by thread: KLBC -moH [was Re: pIqaD]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level