tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 26 20:49:58 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: "New York"Daq lengwIj
- From: "Aryeh ben Naphtali" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: "New York"Daq lengwIj
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 02:58:56 +0300
Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:41 PM ghItlh TPO <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: KLBC: "New York"Daq lengwIj
>leng works like jaH and ghoS. The destination is the direct object. The
>indirect object with -Daq on it is the medium by/in/on which you travel.
>HolQeD Dec 98, Okrand:
TKD 3.3.5. "If the locative suffix is used with such verbs, the resulting
sentence is somewhat redundant, but not out-and-out wrong."
I am ready to obey the laws; but WHAT exactly are they? Is there a list of
'verbs of movement' which do not require -Daq as destination marker?
If you remember, I have already goofed with "WarszawaDaq jipaw"...
Igor=Aryeh