tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 15 16:17:22 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: poH nI'



Voragh:
>Stephan Schneider wrote:
>>  >> vaj jIloS.  'ej jIloS.  nI' poH jIloStaH.  tagha' mavIHqa'.
>>>
>>>  don't we have to say /poH nI' jIloStaH/?
>
>SuStel:
>>Actually, you have to say /qaStaHvIS poH nI' jIloStaH/.
>
>Not so fast.  I noticed that {loS} is glossed "wait for" not just 
>"wait", which means it can take an object.  The question is: Wait 
>for what?  A person or a time period?  Unfortunately, our two 
>examples from canon do not show an object:
>
>   loS... qIb HeHDaq
>   It waits... on the edge of the galaxy (SkyBox DS99)
>
>   DaH maloS.  peghItlh!
>   [untranslated opening message] (MSN st-expert_forum [8/96])
>
>In this {loS] resembles {SIQ}:
>
>   yIn nI' yISIQ 'ej yIchep
>   Live long and prosper! (Radio Times)
>   (lit. "Endure/bear a long life and be prosperous!")
>
>Although I admit that this is not quite the same thing, but the 
>original poster may well have been right, though s/he should have 
>used the object prefix:
>
>   poH nI' vIloStaH.
>   I was waiting for a long time.

ok. so it's wrong to say */nI' poH jIloStaH/ and it's correct to say 
/poH nI' vIloStaH/ or /qaStaHviS poH nI' jIloStaH/. thank you.

tulwI',
sts.


Back to archive top level