tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Aug 15 18:08:26 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: poH nI'

• From: "DloraH" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: poH nI'
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:06:41 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <a05111b64b981c071c403@[151.25.220.79]>

> ok. so it's wrong to say */nI' poH jIloStaH/ and it's correct to say
> /poH nI' vIloStaH/ or /qaStaHviS poH nI' jIloStaH/. thank you.

This sounds like they're waiting for a [long period of time], as in, one
that
is large enough to what they need to do; a short peroid of time is not
sufficient, they need a larger one.  Like when pulling out of a side street,
you're waiting for a gap that is large enough to pull into.

For the amount of time spent waiting, I would use the /qaStaHvIS.../


DloraH

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: poH nI'
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: poH nI'
    • From: Stephan Schneider <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE:
• Next by Date: RE: puS and law'
• Prev by thread: Re: poH nI'
• Next by thread: RE: poH nI'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level