tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 11 15:39:39 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: adverbials
tulwI' jang HomDoq:
>> >of course. whether you see rammo' as a noun with a suffix or as
>> >something else (a phrase, maybe?) doesn't change this.
>> >I still prefer to see it as a noun (with a suffix)
>Stephan Schneider <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> _you_ can see it this way, but the grammar implemented in your brain,
>whatever that means... I'm sure my brain has no difficulty distinguishing
>the word from its function. the word is a noun. its function is giving a
>reason for what happened
ok. then we call it word (aka part of speech) and function (aka part
of sentence). so it's not enough to see a word as a word but as a
function. that was my point. but it's ok now, isn't it?