tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Aug 11 15:39:39 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: adverbials

tulwI' jang HomDoq:

>>  >of course. whether you see rammo' as a noun with a suffix or as
>>  >something else (a phrase, maybe?) doesn't change this.
>>  >
>>  >I still prefer to see it as a noun (with a suffix)
>Stephan Schneider <>
>>  _you_ can see it this way, but the grammar implemented in your brain,
>>  can't.
>whatever that means... I'm sure my brain has no difficulty distinguishing
>the word from its function. the word is a noun. its function is giving a
>reason for what happened

ok. then we call it word (aka part of speech) and function (aka part 
of sentence). so it's not enough to see a word as a word but as a 
function. that was my point. but it's ok now, isn't it?


Back to archive top level