Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: adverbials

[Qov <qov@direct.ca>]

ja'chuqtaHvIS tulwI' HomDoq je ...

 >>> I simply wanted to know whether it is possible to see it that way
 >>> without damaging the language, so to speak.
 >>>
 >
 >> of course one cannot judge this until you make a mistake
 >> which results from your model of the language being different
 >> than that of the majority of speakers...
 >
 > i thought you expert klingons can see that immediately. :)

teHbe'.

DaH SIbI' tlhIngan Hol yIlo'choH.  bIjatlhchu'chugh, vaj ram 
patlIj.  bIjatlhHa'chugh, vaj pat chu' yI'ogh qoj yIlaj, ghIq yIjatlhchoHchu'.

Or, in other words, peja'chuq 'e' yImev, pejatlh neH.