tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Apr 16 23:10:03 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: to'qoq nech

>At 14:28 2002-04-12 -0400, Bartholomew Barker wrote:
>>naDev nIboQqang jatlhwI' law' 'ach nIqeSDI' DaHIv.

ja' "Sean M. Burke" <sburke@cpan.org>:
>muqeSDI'?!?  Those who advise me, I thank graciously.

qaqeSpu' jIH.  chotlho'neS'a'?  ghobe' jay'.  choHIvqu'.

>Those who do little
>more than whinge ignorantly and /at incredible length/ about the stylistics
>of the source text, are a waste of meat.

bIlaDchu'be'ba'.  Will QIn Daqel qar'a'?  wa'logh neH qechvetlh jatlh ghaH.
vIngbe' ghaH.  boQqangbe'moHbogh meq ngu'.

-- ghunchu'wI'

Back to archive top level