tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Apr 12 14:57:46 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: to'qoq nech

At 14:28 2002-04-12 -0400, Bartholomew Barker wrote:
>naDev nIboQqang jatlhwI' law' 'ach nIqeSDI' DaHIv.

muqeSDI'?!?  Those who advise me, I thank graciously.  Those who do little 
more than whinge ignorantly and /at incredible length/ about the stylistics 
of the source text, are a waste of meat.

Sean M. Burke

Back to archive top level