tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 11 09:34:57 2002

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Yet another translation.

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Yet another translation.
• Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:34:45 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6

> >...  Plus to me, "but" doesn't seem proper.
> >A "but" attaches two sentences that are a little bit contradictory.
> >These two sentences which we're using here do not contradict; they are
> >in agreement. If any conjuction I would think "and".  But I prefer none.
> 
> Well, though I do not think that the sentences agree(after all, the
> meaning is quite opposite), 

Perhaps that would be better worded as "they are not in disagreement".


DloraH, BG

• References:
  • Re: Yet another translation.
    • From: [email protected] (Christoph PICHLMANN)

• Prev by Date: Klingon WOTD: ngop (n-pl)
• Next by Date: Re: to' nech, 021: {lojmIt yISoQmoH; Hur yItu'.}
• Prev by thread: Re: Yet another translation.
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another translation.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level