tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 17 22:34:12 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: wa' waQ

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: wa' waQ
• Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:50:53 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <39C255F2.12165.7955834@localhost>
• References: <[email protected]>

ja' nejwI':
>...I incorrectly assumed {Sum} was a
>locational adverb like {naDev} and {pa'}.

Be careful -- {naDev} and {pa'} are not adverbs.  They are nouns.  Along
with {Dat}, they are exceptional because they don't get the locative suffix
{-Daq} when used as locatives, but they are still nouns.  (This is
explained on page 27 of The Klingon Dictionary.)

There are no "locational adverbs".

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: wa' waQ
    • From: "Buck" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Daj (2)
• Next by Date: Re: paq munob? don't think so
• Prev by thread: Re: wa' waQ
• Next by thread: RE: wa' waQ
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level