tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Mar 08 22:54:24 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: jInIDqa'

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: KLBC: jInIDqa'
• Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 01:54:06 EST

jatlh pagh:

>> QublaH Ha'DIbaHmeyvam 'ach jatlhlaHbe'.
>
> QublaH Ha'DIbaHmeyvam chay' net 'ollaH?

ghotpu' 'ollaHbe'.  Sovbe' chaH.  jatlhlaHbe' Ha'DIbaHmey
mu'mey chenmoHlaHbe' neH nujchajmo'.  QublaH 'e' vISov
lut vIja'mo'.  :>

On a similar note, I'm not clear on whether I should be
using <<chaH>> or <<bIH>> for these creatures.  Is the
distinction really made by language use, or is that just
a way of referring to sentience?  Would a group of human
babies or human mutes be called <<bIH>>?  Would a
group of gorillas who spoke sign language be called
<<chaH>>?

>> I'll probably try continuing this later.
>
>maj. Daj lutlIj. taH 'e' vItul.

qatlho'.  vItaH.


-Eodrakken

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: KLBC: jInIDqa'
    • From: "TPO" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: DaHjaj mu'mey:
• Next by Date: KLBC cheng Sa' may' bom vIghItlh rIntaH
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC: jInIDqa'
• Next by thread: RE: KLBC: jInIDqa'
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level