RE: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.

[Burt Clawson <bclawson@teltrust.com>]

jang pagh:

> >> tugh!  ghItroq choljaH yISo'.  ghIq Sam 'e' nIDtaHvIS wIbejlaH.
> >> "Hurry!  Hide G'trok's ponytail holder.  Then we can watch 
> >> while he tries to find it."
> 
> ravDaq jIpum 'ej jIHagh. tlhoS quSwIj vIghor. ghu' vIleghlaHchu'. majQa'.
> 
	DatIvqu' 'e' vIbel.  tlhIngan ghu' tlhaQ jIH much yIqel: <juppu'>.

> One grammar comment, though - you have a <-taH> after an <'e'>. Of course,
> the <-taH> is required with the <-vIS>, so these two rules would seem to
> imply that <-vIS> after <'e'> is illegal. I'll leave the resolution of
> this
> up to you, but I suspect there is some sort of other rule - probably an
> exception to the rule about <'e'> - that permits this.
> 
	I struggled with the <-taH> after <'e'>, but it seemed to make
sense.  I guess I could have used <-DI'>...  ghIq Sam 'e' nIDDI' wIbejlaH.
Or is that even worse?


	- tuv'el