tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 08 11:38:03 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Hoch DaHjaj mu'mey vIwaHqa'qu'.
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 13:37:32 CDT
> I struggled with the <-taH> after <'e'>, but it seemed to make
> sense. I guess I could have used <-DI'>... ghIq Sam 'e' nIDDI' wIbejlaH.
> Or is that even worse?
>
how about {ghIq nejtaH 'e' wIbejlaH} "Then he will be searching
for it and we can watch that." ? or {ghIq nejtaHvIS wIbejlaH}
"Then, while he's searching for it, we can watch him." ?
I think {nej} is pretty close to {Sam 'e' nID}, no?
and the {-taH} is in a position that is allowed.
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
[email protected]