tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 16 21:11:13 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Old subject revistied by a slow newbie
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Old subject revistied by a slow newbie
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:10:39 -0800
At 23:29 00-01-16 -0500, you wrote:
}
}jatlh Qov:
}>}>tlhIngan jechDaq be' ro lanlu'DI', ngech 'ang be' Hab. HIHar.
}
}jatlh Qor:
}>}If {mughta'chugh jIH} your reply correctly, then they make themselves look
}>}as masculine as possible deliberatly. Would that be for equality? It seems
}>}both {tlhInganloD je tlhInganbe'} have the same chances within the
}>}{tlhIngan wo'} and meet most of the same challanges including commanding
}>}warriors and fighting and dieing in battle.
}
}jatlh Qov:
}> 'ach loD rur neHchugh, qatlh be' ro 'ang?
}> Qov 'utlh
}
}<tlhIngan jechDaq be' ro lanlu'DI'> "When one puts on a woman's
}torso in a Klingon costume"...
}
}<ngech 'ang be' Hab> "a smooth woman shows cleavage", 'ach
}<ngech 'angbe' Hab> "(she) doesn't show cleavage, (she) is smooth"
You probably read your tlhIngan Hol with a proportional font. I recommend
NON-proportional fonts with serifs. There is a space between the /'ang/ and
the /be'/.
}chaq yajHa' Qor.
}
}(Also, I may be missing something, but does <Hab> mean the same
}thing as <beQ> in this context?)
Okrand only knows. I used /Hab/ in comparison to foreheads. Maybe /beQ/
would have been better understood. To me /be' beQ/ implies someone landed a
toQDuj on her.
I think you won't believe a description of the Klingon female costumes,
unless you have seen them on the show.
Qov 'utlh