tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 16 21:18:04 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Two Rules [KLBC]

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Two Rules [KLBC]
• Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 00:11:31 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja' De'vID:
>QInlIjvaD "KLBC" Daperchugh, laDnIS chu'wI' pabpo'.  jangpa'
>latlhpu', jang pabpo'.
>= If you label your message as "KLBC", the beginner's grammarian gets first
>dibs in replying to it.
>[<chu'wI'> or <taghwI'> for "beginner"?]

"Beginners' Grammarian" vImughmeH, roD <taghwI'pu' pabpo'> vIlo'.
chaq lughchu'be' <pabpo'>, 'ach reH lo'pu' ghomvam.

I usually translate "Beginners' Grammarian" as {taghwI'pu' pabpo'}.
{pabpo'} might not be completely correct, but it's always been used here.

-- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh

• References:
  • Re: Two Rules [KLBC]
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: 'Ij and qIm
• Next by Date: Re: latlh mIwHom vIchavta'
• Prev by thread: Re: Two Rules [KLBC]
• Next by thread: <<KLIC>> bomuv boneH'a'? ( was RE: Two Rules [KLBC])
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level