tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 15 09:18:41 2000
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:24:30 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:19:38 EST David Trimboli
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to mention: this comes from the December HolQeD.
Page 11.
> SuStel
> Stardate 122.1
>
>
> >From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
>
> >In fact, script written by Okrand, and removed from Star Trek V, indicates
> >that both /qIm/ and /'Ij/ are transitive.
If you read it again, you'll see that only that first
section was removed from the movie. There are often many
scenes shot and then cut in the process of making a movie.
Meanwhile, the line using {'Ij} did make it into the movie
(along with a couple really messy mistakes). So did the
line using {qIm}.
> >This stuff was written by Okrand
> >but never completed on film. Some may say it's not "canon," but it's what
> >Okrand was thinking . . . .
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
charghwI'O