tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Feb 14 18:05:20 2000

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>

• From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>
• Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 19:07:09 -0700

jatlh SuStel:

> In fact, script written by Okrand, and removed from Star Trek V, indicates

> that both /qIm/ and /'Ij/ are transitive.  This stuff was written by
Okrand 
> but never completed on film.  Some may say it's not "canon," but it's what

> Okrand was thinking . . . .

> Sorry, forgot to mention: this comes from the December HolQeD.

Qu'vatlh ghay'cha' baQa'. HolQeDvetlh vIlIjpu'. I had it floating around in
the back of my mind that we found out recently that <qIm> was transitive,
but I could not remember where. I also forgot that <'Ij> was included as
well - probably because I was ambivalent about <qIm>, but I really *liked*
the idea of <'Ij> as intransitive. Oh, well.

pagh

• Follow-Ups:
  • 'Ij and qIm
    • From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC <chyrano berjeraq>
• Next by thread: 'Ij and qIm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level